How does it work
Aggregate Tables are tables added in the external database as a table fed from aggregated data. These tables typically denormalize fields from joined tables into group-by columns, but can also preserve joins to keep the aggregate table smaller while still accessing fields from other tables at query time. Whenever possible, DirectQuery will query the Aggregate Table instead of the base Schema for a more optimized query: For instance, consider a Sales table containing sales such as this one:
It is possible to aggregate the sum of the Quantity per Date and Product in the external database into an other table agg_sales:
If this table is added as an Aggregate Table in DirectQuery, it will be used whenever possible instead of the original Sales table.
For instance when asking for the
SUM(Quantity) per Product in the Sales table, DirectQuery will retrieve the SUM(sum_of_quantity) per product in agg_sales.
As the agg_sales is smaller and already aggregated the result will be faster to compute and will potentially avoid a huge scan of the database, saving both time and compute costs.
Use cases
There are a few classic use cases for using an Aggregate Table:- Feeding an aggregate provider faster by pre-aggregating over the provider fields
- Having an “external database aggregate provider”, i.e. being able to answer some queries from the pre-aggregated data in the external database but without having to store additional data in-memory.
- Feeding some hierarchies faster
Supported aggregations
The following aggregation function can be used in an Aggregate Table:- Sum
- Min
- Max
- Average
- Sum product
- Count
- Long
- Short
- Gross
- Square sum
Custom Aggregations
To use a user defined aggregation function (UDAF) in an aggregate table, map it with the genericMeasureMapping.agg(pluginKey, originFields, targetColumnNames), where pluginKey is the plugin key shared by the Copper UDAF and the DirectQuery UDAF.
How DirectQuery uses the aggregate table depends on the granularity of the query:
- When the query groups by all the group-by columns of the aggregate table, DirectQuery reads the rows of the table as they are. Any DirectQuery UDAF can be used.
- When the query is at a coarser granularity, DirectQuery re-aggregates the table in the external database, which requires the DirectQuery UDAF to be re-aggregable.
For instance, a sum product stored per date and product is re-aggregated with
SUMto get the sum product per date. If the DirectQuery UDAF is not re-aggregable, these queries run on the base tables. No error is raised at start-up.
merge function of the Copper UDAF.
A re-aggregable UDAF is stored in a single column of the aggregate table.
For instance, this ClickHouse table stores the sum product UDAF per date and product:
MY_SUM_PRODUCT:
Examples
Create a simple Aggregate Table to feed an aggregate provider
Let’s create a new table that pre-aggregates the quantity of the tutorial sales table per product. Unlike the agg_sales table above, this table has no date column: it answers the queries on the product only, which is the granularity of the aggregate provider defined below.- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
Let’s first discover the SQL table corresponding to the Aggregate Table:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
PRODUCT field of the sales table to the product field of the Aggregate Table:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
quantity column into a column called quantity_sum, and the number of contributing rows into contributors_count.
Every aggregate table needs this count column:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
quantity column), must be reachable from the base table of the aggregate table.
The path starts from the base table and lists every join leading to the field, as described in Join key fields and join chains.
Otherwise, declaring the schema fails with an invalid schema exception whose message names the field and the base table.
Without this check, such a mapping would never match a query, and the aggregate table would never be used.
We can now build the AggregateTable:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
Product, the feeding of the in-memory provider will be done directly from the Aggregate Table:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
More complex aggregations such as average
In the previous example, SUM was based on a single input and pre-aggregated into a single column, but there are some more complex cases. For instance:counthas no input and produces 1 pre-aggregated columnsumProducttakes N input columns and produces 1 pre-aggregated column, mapped withMeasureMapping.sumProduct(originFields, targetColumnName)averagetakes a single input column but requires 2 pre-aggregated columns in order to be able to re-aggregate: one column for the sum and one for the count
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- Synapse
Create a simple Aggregate Table to feed a hierarchy
For an aggregate table to be used to feed a hierarchy, it needs to be defined with all the levels of the hierarchy asGroupByFieldsMapping and the Count as MeasuresMappings.
In the external database, the table for a hierarchy with the levels (Country, City) would look like:
Count
Every query that DirectQuery sends to the external database also computes the number of contributing rows. Atoti uses this count to tell the locations that have data from the empty ones. An aggregate table must therefore contain a column with the count, mapped withMeasureMapping.count(targetColumnName): without it, the table could never answer a query, so declaring it fails.
To re-aggregate the table at a coarser granularity, DirectQuery sums this column.
Slicing hierarchies
Slicing hierarchies are always expressed in the queries sent to the database. When a field expressed in a query is not part of the Aggregate Table, the query will not use the Aggregate Table. Therefore it is recommended to include the slicing hierarchies in Aggregate Table definition.Aggregate tables with vectors
Arrays can be aggregated in an aggregate table but they need to have a specific format depending on the type of original array being aggregated:
See the DirectQuery vector documentation for more information about array types.
When a query is at a coarser granularity than the aggregate table, DirectQuery re-aggregates a vector stored in a native array column in the external database, provided the database can aggregate that array natively, as described in Native support.
If the database cannot aggregate the array natively, or the array is emulated (multi-column), DirectQuery reads the rows of the aggregate table as they are and Atoti aggregates them. The aggregate table is still used.
Generate SQL for Aggregate Table matching an Aggregate Provider
Aggregate Tables are a good tool to feed Aggregate Providers quickly because they let the provider use pre-aggregated data instead of running a new aggregation. The examples above declare an Aggregate Table that already exists in the external database. When it does not exist yet, DirectQuery provides a bootstrapper that generates the SQL to create and feed an Aggregate Table matching an Aggregate Provider. The bootstrapper is a development-time tool: use it once to obtain the SQL, run that SQL on the external database, then declare the resulting table in the schema of your application like any other Aggregate Table. Let’s imagine we have the following Aggregate Provider defined:- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
AggregateTableDescription and add it to the SchemaDescription, as described in Create a simple Aggregate Table to feed an aggregate provider.
The description returned by toAggregateTable() describes the generated table and can serve as a model for this declaration.
Preserving joins with joinedTableNames
By default, the bootstrapper denormalizes all fields from joined tables into the aggregate table as group-by columns. However, when dealing with dimension tables with many columns, this denormalization can make the aggregate table unnecessarily large. ThejoinToKeepNormalized option allows specifying tables whose fields should remain accessible through joins at query time instead of being denormalized. This keeps the aggregate table smaller while still allowing queries to reference fields from those tables.
When using joinToKeepNormalized:
- Fields accessible through the specified join are not included as group-by columns in the aggregate table
- Join key fields (source fields of the join leading to those tables) are automatically added as group-by columns
- At query time, the aggregate table can still answer queries involving fields from joined tables by performing joins
- This reduces the number of denormalized columns while maintaining query compatibility
joinToKeepNormalized method on the bootstrapper builder with the source table and the join name:
- BigQuery
- ClickHouse
- Databricks
- MsSql
- Redshift
- Snowflake
SALES_TO_PRODUCTS join (starting from SALES) will not be denormalized into the aggregate table. Instead, queries referencing these fields will use joins to access them.
Note that preserving joins comes with a trade-off: queries referencing fields from joined tables will require the join to be performed at query time, which most of the time increases compute costs and result in slower responses.
Join key fields and join chains
Consider the following schema:STORE_ID from Sales as a group-by field in the aggregate table, queries can access fields from Stores and, by transitivity, from Regions as well — without denormalizing those fields into the aggregate table.- Dimension tables have many columns that would bloat the aggregate table
- Reducing storage footprint and improving aggregate table creation time is a priority
Database specific features
Creating a view for an Aggregate Table is not a solution as the view must be recomputed for each query. Creating a table requires to update it when the data changes. Some databases offers native implementations to automatically create and materialize the content of a view (so it is fast to access) while automatically updating it (so it is always up-to-date).- Snowflake
In Snowflake there is a powerful feature called Dynamic tables.
As these Dynamic tables also support time travel it is the recommended way to implement an Aggregate Table in Snowflake.
Aggregate tables and clustering fields
When an aggregate table serves a query, the query is split on the clustering fields of the aggregate table, never on those of the base table, so an aggregate table without clustering fields is read in one query. Clustering fields can be declared on the aggregate table itself. See Clustering fields and aggregate tables for the details.Is my query using the Aggregate Table?
The simplest solution to check whether the query is using an aggregate table is to look at the query in the external database. If that is the case, then the aggregate table name should appear in the SQL query as the base table (the first table in the FROM clause). Additionally, for databases supporting tags such as Snowflake, the tagaggregate_table_name will be added to the query with the name of the aggregate table used.
While building a project, to have more information about why a query is compatible or not with aggregate tables, it is possible to add additional logs by setting the logger atoti.server.directquery.query_resolution.aggregate_table (see Logger naming) to FINE.
The additional logs look like this: